Monday, 25 June 2012

Corporate Abuse - Corporate Bullying

Corporate Abuse - Corporate Bullying




When those named above took my child in the manner they did, then openly abused my family.  All this was done in public.This fact alone reveals that they have no interest in working with me. They took my child and as His Honour Judge Waine put it 'I cannot believe you are still standing and when will you go away?'
In simple English, no can do!

When the council and their mates have your child the word co-operation is purely academic.  They have NO interest working with you. Your child is a number; which guareentees their jobs. This is why they will do anything to make parents kill themselves or runaway. In the meantime, they start brain-washing your child with false reporting, so your child will then go around telling people my parent/s are unable to care for me, or is mentally ill and is always in and out of hospital. 

Do not waste your time doing what they tell you to do; whilst protecting their jobs.  Even interational law makes this clear, parents not co-operating with those named above, is not a good enough reason to retain a child in care.  They are fully aware of this.

Imagine your child as kidnapped, you have done all the captures have requested that you should do and your child is still not returned. You child's captures will be your enemy, as you are their own.

By first sectioning me, placing my child in care and then openly abusing us, the council were hoping that I would kill myself, like any other parent woul have. This is why Coleman kept on going on about me not killing myself. Coleman was putting the thought into my mind, this is what he was all about, to make me run away or better still for me to take my own life.  Yes, the man put this in writing! It is all about the psychology.

Also everytime those named within the contents of the title to this post smashed into my home they would use the same word, KILL.

My advise to many parents is this ....
Follow all my blogs and those of many others, in the last four years many blogs are being produced to help people like us. When I started out there was not much on offer, things have changed. Start learning about your rights.  As soon as your child learns to string words together teach them about their rights, do not let anyone else do this for you, because they will not. Once your child is taken from you, your child will be abused in ways you never could imagine, by the people who should be protecting your child. What an insult, excuse me I mean this is child protection.

They can turn up at your door and part your family just like that. Once this is done the plan is to break you, the will attempt to brush accountability under the carpet. Ever wonder why parents who molest their children etc get away witth it until the child dies or is dragged up to such an extent when they speak English, you do wonder whatever happened to free education?
It is not the system, it is the parenting and social services do not like those who parent. They like the ones who do not, because it brings in the dollars.

I am telling you now, once social services take your child the aim is NOT to keep you all together, it will do everything in it's power to harm you and your child  to get the results they seek.   I want you to imagine your child in a room being openly abused by strangers, you can see exactly what they are doing, but you are prevented from entering the room. This is the only way I can describe care proceedings.

The whole point of having a family lawyer is so the council cannot get away with talking bad about you in Court.  At the first hearing if they do talk badly of you and there is slience coming from your end sack the solicitor ASAP. Make a complaint in writng and fax it and kiss your legal aid goodbye. Your child's safety is more important, fight for your family. My mistake was walking alongside the so-called local authority. The trauma of what they did to me, then my child did affect me, I trusted the very people who used their positions to abuse us. That was then, this now. Trust is earned.

Focus on your Court cases no matter what they do to you. Remember, their aim is for you to runaway or kill yourself and this is NOT what you are going to do. When that plan backfires they will use you and your home like a dustbin, so the general public can join in with the abuse of you. This is what will happen to you.

Four years on and I did not have my child back. This means they are still abusing us.  Working in partnership together is not on the menu.

When the smashing of windows did not break me, so they can gather the evidence and write we told you so, they started smashing into my home making it quite clear if I do not do what they say they will section me. They did to me for the community to observe.

When I get my child back, I will carry their flag and say how great they are.  Until then, this is not going to happen.  Even if Elvis rose from the dead to bring about order to this mess, I will tell him come back when you have my child in tow.  I did not come to Northampton town to act in a real life version of Roots.

When I was in the psychiatric unit many patients opened up to me when they accepted that I was not a plant.  I also manged to get a pen knife onto the unit. I had the pen knife for week before they found out it. I took the pen knife out to cut the African thread from my child's hair after I had redone her hair.   You should have seen the psychiatrists, fright is not the word. All they said to me is this: "That there are people here who are really mentally ill and if they found the pen-knife ..." They could not finish off the sentence.
All I am stating is this: In my famly's case there is an assumption of what if?
Ngozi Godwell got into a psychiatric unit with a pen knife; whilst they were all looking the other way.  If I was any other person 1. I would have gone on a murdering spree within the psychiatric unit or 2. Left the pen-knife about so a patient who is really mentally ill could have done the job for me.

It was the social worker Marie Sheard who alerted the hospital.  When contact was taking place at social services I pulled the pen-knife from my back pocket slowly, the social worker froze. Behind the two-way mirror mayhem must have broken out. The only person who did not blink was my child, because she knew that all I was going to do was cut off the thread from her hair.

From the start of this farce, there has been mistake upon mistake. I do not need or want the help of these people, not before they return my child to me. There are better and more intelligence forms of help I can get elsewhere. Do I need to write that going near these people; whilst they still have my child is placing myself at risk?
The very same people who run away from the European Court of Human Rights and decided to administer their own form of justice.

After reading the  above letter, if you do not know already, they knew they made a mistake when they took my child. Hence the sectioning is so that I do not claim any damages.  All those party to my detention in the psychiatric unit are party to the crimes against my family. Of the most importance, anyone putting pen to paper in an attempt to help the above named institiuations bury the abuses of my family to make others look good, are also party to the crimes.  There is no point stating "I did not know." 

If they had let me walk when it was apparent that there  is nothing wrong with me. I would have gone for my child within 72 hours and they would have not had a legal leg to stand on. This why I was sectioned after spending 12 hours in a police cell, they could not find anything wrong with my child, as they had hoped. So they picked on me.  One black woman and a child amongst a very big gang. This is what they call child protection.

I must point out that His Honour Judge Waine did read ALL the correspondence between Mr Prester Coleman and I. This judge had his eyes wide open.

Mr Sean Carter and Mr Michael Alderman informed me, we do not care how long it takes. Meaning for me to crack. They need to jog on, the fact that I did not crack after a year and a half means, this is never going to happen. Let us now see who will lose their job first, there is a long list of names to play with.  My name may not come up when jobs are being lost, but who cares?
As long as they do not use their positions of authority to harm others as they are doing to my family.  I do wonder how many children have died; whilst placed on the child protection list in the last four years. I am aware of two children in Northampton and I bet there is more. 

This is amazing, they leave the yobs with their dysfunctional families and they pick on one black woman and her only child. If this is not racism, what is?
They abuse us like complete dogs; whilst bending over for the yobs and their parents. In four years some of the yobs have gone to prison for other offences or have had their own children and still are unable to read or write. By the way almost all the yobs are now labelled with ADHD, another insult to good parents who work hard to support their children. 

The population of Northampton may have people of different cultures living there, but this does not make a cultural diverse population.

Direct discrimination is an important issue. My niece refused to relocate with her job to this part of the country, rendering herself unemployed. She made it clear that she would rather stay in London and use her masters degree to find another job, because as far as she is concerned people like her NEVER relocate here the reason being, is you just have to  look at all they have done to me and you will understand that black intelligent women never ever come here to live unless with a white man . There are 1000's with the same view. They are correct! All those academics and scholars who have written about racism in particular parts of rural Britain, are not messing about. The mistake I made was thinking that they were writing about the 1950's and 1960's.  I made one fatal error I believed in justice 


Me now.

Inhumane Treatment.

Involuntary Commitment
Each year, approximately one and a half million people are taken to psychiatric institutions against their will. That averages out to one person every 75 seconds. Often, there is no reasonable justification for committing a person.

Corporate Abuse - Corporate Bullying

Monday, 18 June 2012


All The Judgments


"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'This the business of little minds to shrink, but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death."  ~ Thomas Paine

Judgment One.

Why is the case being heard in PRIVATE?
Check my child's name.
It is the lower court who announced to all and sundry my child's identity. 
MY CHILD is in care is, because of people's jobs.

What they were doing was sticking their fingers up at my child and I. They still are.

I am the person who made the request to discharge the care order in the form of an application to the Magistrates' Court. The council my child solicitor and all those in the court room contested my application. Permission was granted and the case transfered to county court. My child's solictor stormed out of court without so much as a nod. The magistrates' asked me to leave and for everyone else to stay.

I waited outside to spy their exist and they all looked like they had been verbally abused without the use of the Oxford dictionary.

Then something bad happened at the next hearing .... District Judge Karen Anne Venables decided to protect her reputation instead of my child's well-being. I brought all the evidence to court,  submitted on paper and audio recordings to show that my child was and is being abused by her foster carers. You can read what District Karen Anne Venables and later the two other judges did.  By the way they are still abusing us and I am not standing for this any more.  

My child was a happy and well adjusted child with so much to give. They in their own words wrote that she is NOW a vulnerable child. They did this to my only child.
"When a person who is honestly mistaken is confronted with the truth they must either cease to be mistaken, or cease to be honest." 

Judgment RT Hon. Lord Justice Alan Ward

Judgment His Honour Judge Stephen Waine



In reference to the petition there are just  a few signatures, but many names are advocates who have been working hard for years before I came along. Some are also parents who are victims of the family court system. All those who signed are empowered people. The petition as a case study is excellent. I must thank all those who signed and a special thanks to those who made comments too.


I will also like to thank Facebook for giving me the opportunity to make all this happen, keeping me a live during the early days. Last, but not least, fighting my corner with the local establishment. The local establishment were not entirely forthcoming when it contacted Facebook and made a request that Facebook pull down my works. Unlike the local establishment, the Facebook team have it going on, are able to read legal papers and understand  what the law is. Something particular lazy and bad judges turn a blind eye to.  Facebook replaced my website with all its contents intact (the local establishment should be doing the same with my child). I did not once contact Facebook when I found my website gone. I was over the moon when my website was back on-line some weeks later. Facebook has helped adopted children locate their parents and has supported parents in getting their stories out there; whilst keeping them sane.. 


The murder of my family is racially motivated.
We were the victims of racial harassment and we still are.

People speak up and out.

It has taken me two years to prove that this has not only happened to me.
The issues; which have destroyed my only family and led to my attempted murder is a global issue. 
Government funded child trafficking
Depending on where you live you and your family could be the next victims. Until my child's return to not bother coming to live in Northampton town UK. 
I am empowered and I do not care what they do to me any more, because one day the jobs they tried to protect at my family's expense, will be gone. There are so many who are now exposing what Child Protection Service is really about.

Judgment (Spelling)

See also: American and British English spelling differences
My child has suffered in the hands of these people. My child is brainwashed with fear.  Four years of prolonged abuse my family is experiencing. What an insult!  All this has done is made me stronger.  They tried on many occasions to kill me
They hoped I would use my own hand to kill myself. Then they invited anyone to smash into my home or to abuse me on the street. This is the example given by: 





I hope you all do understand my child's life is at risk. Before my attempted murder I was approached and told that the local establishment will kill my child to hide what they have done to her. There is more...

In the meantime, to promote my child's safety I am spilling the beans.  I am an adult I can fight of a man with an axe. My child is only a child.  

Miss Laura Bonner.  Maxine Clark.   Solicitor Mr Roy Warren ..

His Honour Judge Steven Waine said to me when my child complained about how she has learnt about wickedness,  that I am going to learn about wickedness too. I have. Now they know what happens when they take a child belonging to a Londoner, who is black, has African blood, is educated and a woman!

So if anything happens to my child .....

All The Judgments

Thursday, 14 June 2012

Millions Of Tax Payers Money Wasted

Millions Of Tax Payers Money Wasted

As I have demonstrated the abduction of my child by Northamptonshire police force is planned. As they waited for was the right opportunity to do so.  Then realised with half an hour of having my child that they made a huge mistake they had indeed taken an educated, happy and well-adjusted child. Millions of pounds belonging to the tax payer have been spent attempting to cover up their mistake. All the while my child and I are being abused openly. Four long years of tax payers money to cover up a mistake. If they had given my child back on the day she was taken and given us the support we need with a small donation, millions of tax payers money would have gone on to helped so many people and pay people's wages, but no they spend it attempting to cover up their mistakes and abuse a child, add this to the nine million pounds overspend by the Council for children in care (a couple of years ago). Do I need to go on further?
I do not think so!

 My child and I are victims of racial harassment. I am then prosecuted when my family is clearly the victim. During the process Northamptonshire police force did sabotage the case.  For example the transcript is not the same as the interview. During the trial I make a request for the audio recording to be played in court. I brought my own copy, the one supplied to me by the police. The prosecution refuse to play my copy and instead adjourn to retrieve the police copy. When played in Court, the interview cannot be heard, because there is so much background noise.  I offer the prosecution and the bench the opportunity to play my copy, the prosecution say no and the bench says nothing. Miss Perez is the clerk, the same woman who later complains that I placed her name on a website and then signed my child away forever. These people are fully trained professionals who know what they are doing. If they are confused, mistaken or unclear they should get out and let someone with more intelligence do their job, simple. There is more to this sorry story.  For now I will finish this part by stating I was refused legal aid even though I could have been committed to prison and Northampton Magistrates’ Court refused me access to a duty solicitor even though I begged for one.

     Prior to the and during trial, yobs still stoned and egged my home. The yobs continued to attack my child and I on the street.  
      Later a lawyer in London advised me, a specialist mental health lawyer. The reason I approached him first is because Miss Perez wrote I had mental health issues.  Another barrister in London formulated my appeal application for me even though it was out of time. He did so stating that a grave injustice had been done to me. He advised me never to expect Northamptonshire Police Force to help me and further incidents I must deal with via the civil courts.  He also made it clear  it is important I continue to log all incidents (I hope this time he is wrong). He provides to me the details of the Anti-Racists Alliance in London. 

       Months later on the advice of the Anti-Racist Alliance I fled back home to London with my only child. My GP provided a supporting letter and social services refused to. We were housed for four days. The Anti-Racist Alliance were there for me all the way, if I knew what I did now I would accepted the offer of accommodation from social services when my application was turned down, but all I could think of was my little girl and who really wants to be involved with Social Services. Only if I known then what I do now. Anti-Racists Alliance are aware they know about real injustice and told me off for going back to Northampton, they would have helped me. This is why they demanded that I contacted them once I reached London. I just became dejected and returned, I gave up when I came so far. This is what Racial Abuse does to you.

      When I returned from London of course Probation and Northampton Borough Council denied any knowledge about the housing issues. I was recalled to the Magistrates’ Court, because of my good behaviour and the fact Probation could no longer deny knowledge of the true events, which led to my conviction. London had viewed all the evidence  I was given a conditional discharge for good behaviour and warned that I must not get in trouble for a year. If I did this it is considered to be a breach of the Probation Order.  I was discharged.  Northamptonshire Police Force the Court Order was spent. 
      At a later date I had a Criminal Barrister from Courtney Griffins QC Chamber between her and the prosecution they worked out that either there was a major issue with the police computerised system or someone was tampering with paperwork as with the same my medical records. She told me to go back to District Judge Venables, I told her she just will not listen. My Barristers told me straight litigants do win.  I am aware of this. 

When I returned to London of course Probation and Northampton Borough Council denied any knowledge about the housing issues. I was returned to the Magistrates’ Court, because of my good behaviour and the fact Probation could no longer deny knowledge of the true events, which led to my conviction. London had viewed all the evidence met my child; which was showed very clearly my child and I, are the victims. From then on bad things were going to my child and I.  Wicked things were going to happen to us, we were going to visit hell and we never knew it. I was given a conditional discharge for good behaviour and warned that I must not get in trouble for a year.   If I did this will be considered to be a breach of the Probation Order I was currently to be discharged of and would be sent to prison.  As usual I was good and by the time my child was kidnapped by the Northamptonshire Police Force the Court Order was spent.

Wednesday, 6 June 2012

Family Court System

Family Court System



The media have helped particular Judges get away with gagging orders, during Care Proceedings; especially those related to Public Law .

A gagging order is only valid for the duration of the case. Once the case is closed the gagging order is no longer valid. If the local council has anything further to state in respect to a gagging order, they must appeal. If the case was heard in the Supreme Court their appeal must be made to the European Court of Human Right.

There is no point going with the injunction route, especially if the parent was threatened in writing with an injunction on 6th November 2009.  Why did they not take it out there and then; whilst we were all in the court room?  Justice Lord Alan Ward stated on 19th January 2010 that the case of Minor G is nothing to do with child protection, it is personal. We all know this and guess what he did about this. At the end of the day Judges and Social Workers are governed by Law and this is the time to remind them.

During the month on November 2008 Social Workers, Northamptonshire County Council reveal within the contents of my child’s J Core Assessment that the council and its affiliates had been going through my telephone bill.  No mention of the fact that Solicitor Mr Chris Bennett had been calling me for well over a year to chat dirty with me. In the meantime I fully aware that Mr Chris Bennett went to see my only child to tell her she is never coming home, in the meantime hands to all of you. You do not snatch a young beautiful black girl child at the tender age of 10 years and think I am going to let you get away with it do you.  It is obvious that certain people decided to exploit my child. They have had their fun.

When they took my child the only mistake they made was that they could  not find anything wrong with my child.  They took my child, because she is black. Then treated her like a dog, Northamptonshire County Council did not take Nichola Sharman’s child or those of Louise Peet . The council wanted the black child.  Child protection is a farce.

Prester Coleman, Solicitor, Northampton, Northamptonshire